CFB Standings 2008 — College Football Conference Tables

College Football

Season

Conference board · 2008

FBS conference standings

2008 archive — ranked by win % per conference. Affiliation uses modern FBS labels.

How to read this table

Teams are sorted by win percentage, then total wins — not alphabetically.

Overall: Season wins–losses in all games.
Win %: Wins ÷ games (ties = half a win). Rank uses this first.
Conf: Wins–losses vs conference opponents only.
PF / PA / Diff: Points scored, allowed, and differential (PF − PA).

Conferences 12

Teams 124

Season 2008

Archive 2008

Conference leaders

Conference race

SEC

15 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Florida FLA	9–0	1.000 100.0%	—	380	86	+294
2	Oklahoma OU	9–1	.900 90.0%	—	544	279	+265
3	Texas TEX	9–1	.900 90.0%	—	436	201	+235
4	Alabama ALA	12–2	.857 85.7%	8–0	422	200	+222
5	Georgia UGA	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	333	269	+64
6	Mississippi —	9–4	.692 69.2%	5–3	417	247	+170
7	Missouri MIZ	8–4	.667 66.7%	—	509	355	+154
8	Louisiana State —	8–5	.615 61.5%	3–5	402	314	+88
9	Auburn AUB	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	143	153	-10
10	South Carolina SC	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	129	169	-40
11	Arkansas ARK	5–7	.417 41.7%	2–6	263	374	-111
12	Kentucky UK	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	211	243	-32
13	Vanderbilt VAN	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	176	211	-35
14	Tennessee TENN	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	173	198	-25
15	Mississippi State MSST	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	94	185	-91

Conference race

Big Ten

18 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Southern California —	12–1	.923 92.3%	8–1	488	117	+371
2	Penn State PSU	11–1	.917 91.7%	—	482	149	+333
3	Ohio State OSU	9–1	.900 90.0%	—	292	122	+170
4	Oregon ORE	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	493	292	+201
5	Michigan State MSU	9–3	.750 75.0%	—	314	263	+51
6	Northwestern NU	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	261	225	+36
7	Iowa IOWA	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	317	156	+161
8	Nebraska NEB	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	399	338	+61
9	Maryland MD	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	186	202	-16
10	Minnesota MINN	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	246	257	-11
11	Rutgers RUTG	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	310	222	+88
12	Wisconsin WIS	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	308	268	+40
13	UCLA UCLA	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	205	261	-56
14	Illinois ILL	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	297	298	-1
15	Purdue PUR	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	254	291	-37
16	Indiana IU	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	201	420	-219
17	Michigan MICH	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	227	341	-114
18	Washington WASH	0–10	.000 0.0%	—	132	379	-247

Conference race

Big 12

16 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Utah UTAH	8–0	1.000 100.0%	—	309	131	+178
2	Texas Tech TTU	7–1	.875 87.5%	—	344	245	+99
3	Texas Christian —	11–2	.846 84.6%	7–1	437	147	+290
4	Cincinnati CIN	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	241	211	+30
5	Brigham Young —	10–3	.769 76.9%	6–2	445	285	+160
6	Oklahoma State OKST	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	386	282	+104
7	West Virginia WVU	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	240	170	+70
8	Arizona ARIZ	8–5	.615 61.5%	5–4	476	277	+199
9	Kansas KU	7–5	.583 58.3%	—	392	354	+38
10	Arizona State ASU	5–7	.417 41.7%	4–5	274	272	+2
11	Colorado COLO	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	194	303	-109
12	Houston HOU	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	308	276	+32
13	Central Florida —	4–8	.333 33.3%	3–5	199	289	-90
14	Kansas State KSU	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	306	390	-84
15	Baylor BAY	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	244	325	-81
16	Iowa State ISU	1–8	.111 11.1%	—	194	330	-136

Conference race

ACC

17 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Pittsburgh PITT	9–3	.750 75.0%	—	352	276	+76
2	California CAL	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	397	225	+172
3	Georgia Tech GT	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	304	219	+85
4	North Carolina UNC	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	285	176	+109
5	Virginia Tech VT	8–4	.667 66.7%	—	265	220	+45
6	Boston College BC	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	218	203	+15
7	Wake Forest WAKE	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	197	170	+27
8	Florida State FSU	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	251	225	+26
9	Miami MIA	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	194	208	-14
10	North Carolina State —	6–7	.462 46.2%	4–4	305	342	-37
11	Clemson CLEM	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	180	173	+7
12	Stanford STAN	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	255	243	+12
13	Virginia UVA	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	170	208	-38
14	Duke DUKE	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	224	254	-30
15	Louisville LOU	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	203	325	-122
16	Syracuse SYR	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	187	371	-184
17	Southern Methodist —	1–11	.083 8.3%	0–7	256	458	-202

Conference race

Pac-12

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Oregon State ORST	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	322	272	+50
2	Washington State WSU	1–9	.100 10.0%	—	107	468	-361

Conference race

American

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Rice RICE	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	394	348	+46
2	East Carolina ECU	6–3	.667 66.7%	—	202	196	+6
3	Tulsa TLSA	5–3	.625 62.5%	—	346	237	+109
4	Navy NAVY	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	259	237	+22
5	Florida Atlantic FAU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	240	304	-64
6	South Florida USF	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	190	205	-15
7	Memphis MEM	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	199	177	+22
8	Temple TEM	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	253	267	-14
9	Alabama Birmingham —	4–8	.333 33.3%	3–5	273	375	-102
10	Army ARMY	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	150	235	-85
11	Tulane TULN	1–7	.125 12.5%	—	111	287	-176
12	North Texas UNT	1–9	.100 10.0%	—	224	478	-254

Conference race

Mountain West

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Boise State BOIS	8–0	1.000 100.0%	—	319	107	+212
2	Air Force AF	8–5	.615 61.5%	5–3	348	289	+59
3	Fresno State FRES	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	252	290	-38
4	Hawaii —	7–7	.500 50.0%	4–3	345	404	-59
5	San Jose State —	6–6	.500 50.0%	3–4	224	259	-35
6	Colorado State CSU	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	174	252	-78
7	New Mexico UNM	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	205	171	+34
8	Nevada NEV	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	235	269	-34
9	Nevada Las Vegas —	5–7	.417 41.7%	2–6	307	391	-84
10	Wyoming WYO	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	115	200	-85
11	Utah State USU	1–6	.143 14.3%	—	178	294	-116
12	San Diego State SDSU	0–6	.000 0.0%	—	88	262	-174

Conference race

Sun Belt - East

5 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Appalachian State —	11–3	.786 78.6%	8–0	522	303	+219
2	Marshall MRSH	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	176	269	-93
3	Coastal Carolina CCU	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	10	66	-56
4	Georgia Southern GASO	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	21	45	-24
5	James Madison JMU	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	7	31	-24

Conference race

Sun Belt - West

5 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Troy TROY	6–3	.667 66.7%	—	272	190	+82
2	Louisiana UL	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	331	339	-8
3	Southern Mississippi —	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	216	214	+2
4	Arkansas State ARST	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	192	247	-55
5	Louisiana Monroe —	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	226	276	-50

Conference race

MAC

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Ball State BALL	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	397	212	+185
2	Western Michigan WMU	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	266	251	+15
3	Central Michigan CMU	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	332	357	-25
4	Bowling Green BGSU	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	312	251	+61
5	Buffalo BUF	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	325	323	+2
6	Akron AKR	5–7	.417 41.7%	3–5	360	375	-15
7	Northern Illinois NIU	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	239	201	+38
8	Kent State KENT	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	230	356	-126
9	Ohio OHIO	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	197	270	-73
10	Eastern Michigan EMU	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	257	427	-170
11	Toledo TOL	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	227	363	-136
12	Miami Ohio —	2–10	.167 16.7%	1–7	221	392	-171

Conference race

CUSA

8 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Louisiana Tech LT	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	181	234	-53
2	Middle Tennessee State —	5–7	.417 41.7%	3–4	274	299	-25
3	Texas El Paso —	5–7	.417 41.7%	4–4	395	444	-49
4	Florida International FIU	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	265	319	-54
5	New Mexico State NMSU	1–6	.143 14.3%	—	129	273	-144
6	Jacksonville State JXST	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	14	41	-27
7	Sam Houston State —	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	14	38	-24
8	Western Kentucky WKU	0–9	.000 0.0%	—	113	283	-170

Conference race

FBS Indep.

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Connecticut —	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	251	234	+17
2	Notre Dame ND	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	269	229	+40

College football standings guide

What are college football standings?

College football standings are FBS conference tables that rank teams by win percentage using overall and conference records. FantasyHQ’s 2008 board covers 12 conferences and 124 teams, with archive seasons available, plus filters for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and every other FBS league.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

How to use

Choose a season — current year when LIVE, or an archive year.
Filter with a conference chip or stay on All for every FBS table.
Read overall record, conference mark, and win % — then open a team page.

Related tools

CFB rankings — AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP boards.
CFB Playoff Predictor — project the CFP field from today’s races.
College football schedule — remaining games that move these tables.
FBS team football schedules — school hubs with records and SOS.
CFB Stat Leaders — who is driving conference races.
College Football HQ — portal, Heisman, teams, and more.

Frequently asked questions

Where can I find 2008 college football standings?

Open FantasyHQ college football standings at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings for every FBS conference in 2008, or pick a chip for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and more.

What do overall and conference records mean in CFB standings?

Overall is the team’s full-season W–L. Conference is wins and losses against league opponents only — the mark that usually decides the conference race and championship-game seeds.

How often are college football standings updated?

Standings refresh with the CFB HQ data pipeline after games finalize. This page was last labeled August 24, 2026.

How do conference standings affect the College Football Playoff?

Conference champions and top at-large teams from strong leagues feed the CFP field. Use FantasyHQ’s Playoff Predictor at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/playoff-predictor to project the bracket from current races.

Are FantasyHQ CFB standings free?

Yes. College football standings, team pages, schedule, and the playoff predictor are free to use in the browser — no download required.

Can I browse historical college football standings?

Yes. Open season archives like https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017 or pick a year on the standings board (2000–present), then filter by conference (for example https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017/sec).