Marist Red Foxes vs. St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas: 2025 Week 10 Recap

Quick answer

St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas defeated Marist Red Foxes 45– in Week 10, 2025. Final score: Marist Red Foxes , St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas 45.

Game summary

Line score

Final score and points by quarter.

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Marist Red Foxes	0	0	0	0
St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas	12	18	6	3	45

Stars of the game

Top passers, rushers, and receivers from cfbfastR play-by-play.

Passing

• No Huddle #2 A.Peters (St. Thomas (MN)) — 101.0 yds · +0.59 EPA/play +4.12 EPA
• No Huddle-Shotgun #2 A.Peters (St. Thomas (MN)) — 99.0 yds · +0.20 EPA/play +2.35 EPA
• No Huddle-Shotgun #7 A.Powell (St. Thomas (MN)) — 49.0 yds · -0.23 EPA/play -1.59 EPA

Rushing

• A. Peters (St. Thomas (MN)) — 1.0 yds · 1 TD +0.30 EPA

Receiving

• #7 L.Martinez thrown to 43 (Marist) — 0 rec · 0.0 yds -0.40 EPA
• #3 Q.Cobb-Butler caught at 25 (St. Thomas (MN)) — 1 rec · 49.0 yds +1.77 EPA
• Q. Cobb-Butler (St. Thomas (MN)) — 1 rec · 38.0 yds +2.05 EPA

Quarterback report card

Attempts, efficiency, and EPA.

Player	Team	Att	Cmp%	Yds	TD	EPA/play	Total EPA
No Huddle #2 A.Peters	St. Thomas (MN)	7	57.1%	101	0	+0.59	+4.12
No Huddle-Shotgun #2 A.Peters	St. Thomas (MN)	12	58.3%	99	0	+0.20	+2.35
No Huddle-Shotgun #7 A.Powell	St. Thomas (MN)	7	42.9%	49	0	-0.23	-1.59
No Huddle-Shotgun #18 W.O'Dell	Marist	26	46.2%	121	0	-0.15	-3.81

Team EPA comparison

Stat	Marist	St. Thomas (MN)
Plays	50	69
EPA / play	+0.013	+0.004
Total EPA	+0.64	+0.29
Success rate	24.0%	42.0%
Pass EPA / play	-0.146	+0.363
Rush EPA / play	+0.185	-0.241
Yards	223	406

Drive chart

Key possessions and results.

Qtr	Offense	Plays	Yards	EPA	Result
Q1	St. Thomas (MN)	3	9	-3.68	Punt
Q1	Marist	7	19	+13.52	Ended
Q1	St. Thomas (MN)	1	38	+2.05	Pass TD
Q1	Marist	3	-18	-2.39	Punt
Q1	St. Thomas (MN)	8	16	-0.89	Rush TD
Q1	Marist	6	53	+3.44	Fumble
Q2	St. Thomas (MN)	7	32	-0.32	Punt
Q2	Marist	4	15	-3.66	Interception
Q2	St. Thomas (MN)	3	31	+3.29	Rush TD
Q2	Marist	3	82	-3.89	Interception
Q2	St. Thomas (MN)	8	55	+3.90	Rush TD
Q2	Marist	6	17	+0.19	Punt
Q2	St. Thomas (MN)	7	80	+5.00	Pass TD
Q2	Marist	1	6	+0.88	Ended
Q3	St. Thomas (MN)	3	19	+2.86	Ended
Q3	Marist	3	3	-3.42	Punt

Biggest EPA swings

1. Q2 · Marist Red Foxes · No Huddle-Shotgun #18 W.O'Dell pass intercepted (-6.65 EPA)
2. Q2 · Marist Red Foxes · Fumble (-5.91 EPA)
3. Q4 · St. Thomas (MN) · Rush (1st & 10) (-5.18 EPA)
4. Q1 · St. Thomas (MN) · Fumble (-5.1 EPA)
5. Q2 · Marist Red Foxes · No Huddle-Shotgun #18 W.O'Dell pass intercepted (-4.59 EPA)
6. Q1 · St. Thomas (MN) · Rush (4th & 7) (+4.54 EPA)
7. Q3 · St. Thomas (MN) · Penalty (3rd & 13) (-4.21 EPA)
8. Q3 · Marist Red Foxes · No Huddle-Shotgun #18 W.O'Dell pass to #22 T.Shannon caught at 35 for 2 yards (1st & 10) (+4.19 EPA)

Key takeaways

• St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas controlled the final (45–) in Week 10.
• Passing edge: No Huddle #2 A.Peters (St. Thomas (MN)) — 101.0 yds.
• EPA edge: Marist at 0.013 EPA/play.
• Full EPA, scoring map, and play-by-play live in CFB Analytics Box & Scores.

Frequently asked questions

What was the final score of Marist Red Foxes vs St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas?

Marist Red Foxes 0, St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas 45 in Week 10 of the 2025 college football season.

Who won Marist Red Foxes vs St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas?

St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas won with a final score of 0–45.

Where can I find the Marist Red Foxes vs St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas box score?

See EPA, scoring timeline, and full play-by-play on FantasyHQ CFB Analytics: /cfb-analytics?game=401767631.

Who led Marist Red Foxes vs St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas in passing?

No Huddle #2 A.Peters (St. Thomas (MN)) led passers with 101.0 yards.

Full analytics box score

Explore every snap, drive chart, and the interactive scoring map for Marist Red Foxes at St. Joseph's (IN) Pumas in FantasyHQ CFB Analytics Box & Scores.