CFB Standings 2009 — College Football Conference Tables

College Football

Season

Conference board · 2009

FBS conference standings

2009 archive — ranked by win % per conference. Affiliation uses modern FBS labels.

How to read this table

Teams are sorted by win percentage, then total wins — not alphabetically.

Overall: Season wins–losses in all games.
Win %: Wins ÷ games (ties = half a win). Rank uses this first.
Conf: Wins–losses vs conference opponents only.
PF / PA / Diff: Points scored, allowed, and differential (PF − PA).

Conferences 12

Teams 125

Season 2009

Archive 2009

Conference leaders

Conference race

SEC

15 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Alabama ALA	14–0	1.000 100.0%	8–0	449	164	+285
2	Texas TEX	10–0	1.000 100.0%	—	381	148	+233
3	Florida FLA	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	376	144	+232
4	Louisiana State —	9–4	.692 69.2%	5–3	323	211	+112
5	Mississippi —	9–4	.692 69.2%	4–4	384	230	+154
6	Missouri MIZ	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	312	283	+29
7	Tennessee TENN	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	350	210	+140
8	Arkansas ARK	5–3	.625 62.5%	—	306	217	+89
9	Georgia UGA	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	281	297	-16
10	Auburn AUB	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	289	241	+48
11	Oklahoma OU	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	231	138	+93
12	Kentucky UK	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	247	262	-15
13	South Carolina SC	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	200	218	-18
14	Mississippi State MSST	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	168	251	-83
15	Vanderbilt VAN	1–8	.111 11.1%	—	135	234	-99

Conference race

Big Ten

18 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Ohio State OSU	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	336	128	+208
2	Iowa IOWA	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	260	170	+90
3	Oregon ORE	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	405	263	+142
4	Penn State PSU	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	304	139	+165
5	Wisconsin WIS	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	298	245	+53
6	Nebraska NEB	9–4	.692 69.2%	—	319	146	+173
7	Southern California —	9–4	.692 69.2%	5–4	344	258	+86
8	Northwestern NU	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	239	260	-21
9	Rutgers RUTG	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	243	202	+41
10	UCLA UCLA	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	249	227	+22
11	Michigan State MSU	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	311	298	+13
12	Minnesota MINN	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	243	282	-39
13	Purdue PUR	5–7	.417 41.7%	—	334	349	-15
14	Michigan MICH	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	291	324	-33
15	Washington WASH	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	232	253	-21
16	Indiana IU	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	263	341	-78
17	Maryland MD	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	194	305	-111
18	Illinois ILL	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	245	345	-100

Conference race

Big 12

16 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Cincinnati CIN	10–0	1.000 100.0%	—	371	233	+138
2	Texas Christian —	12–1	.923 92.3%	8–0	498	166	+332
3	Houston HOU	8–1	.889 88.9%	—	405	257	+148
4	Utah UTAH	7–1	.875 87.5%	—	241	126	+115
5	Brigham Young —	11–2	.846 84.6%	7–1	461	280	+181
6	West Virginia WVU	9–3	.750 75.0%	—	319	249	+70
7	Oklahoma State OKST	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	270	224	+46
8	Texas Tech TTU	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	372	196	+176
9	Arizona ARIZ	8–5	.615 61.5%	6–3	356	311	+45
10	Central Florida —	8–5	.615 61.5%	6–2	340	293	+47
11	Iowa State ISU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	209	219	-10
12	Arizona State ASU	4–8	.333 33.3%	2–7	268	253	+15
13	Kansas State KSU	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	144	242	-98
14	Baylor BAY	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	178	276	-98
15	Kansas KU	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	270	331	-61
16	Colorado COLO	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	232	312	-80

Conference race

ACC

17 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Georgia Tech GT	11–2	.846 84.6%	—	459	323	+136
2	Pittsburgh PITT	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	329	199	+130
3	Virginia Tech VT	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	339	179	+160
4	California CAL	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	289	257	+32
5	Miami MIA	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	305	245	+60
6	North Carolina UNC	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	225	169	+56
7	Southern Methodist —	8–5	.615 61.5%	6–2	380	359	+21
8	Boston College BC	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	203	213	-10
9	Clemson CLEM	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	325	222	+103
10	Stanford STAN	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	337	276	+61
11	North Carolina State —	5–7	.417 41.7%	2–6	364	374	-10
12	Florida State FSU	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	259	299	-40
13	Duke DUKE	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	188	274	-86
14	Virginia UVA	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	204	260	-56
15	Wake Forest WAKE	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	251	284	-33
16	Louisville LOU	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	187	305	-118
17	Syracuse SYR	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	213	311	-98

Conference race

Pac-12

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Oregon State ORST	6–3	.667 66.7%	—	296	211	+85
2	Washington State WSU	0–9	.000 0.0%	—	88	370	-282

Conference race

American

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Temple TEM	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	305	201	+104
2	East Carolina ECU	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	284	224	+60
3	Navy NAVY	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	267	182	+85
4	Florida Atlantic FAU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	280	322	-42
5	South Florida USF	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	218	247	-29
6	Tulsa TLSA	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	314	273	+41
7	Alabama Birmingham —	5–7	.417 41.7%	4–4	333	388	-55
8	Army ARMY	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	162	246	-84
9	North Texas UNT	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	298	390	-92
10	Tulane TULN	1–5	.167 16.7%	—	82	199	-117
11	Rice RICE	1–7	.125 12.5%	—	130	364	-234
12	Memphis MEM	0–6	.000 0.0%	—	123	245	-122

Conference race

Mountain West

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Boise State BOIS	8–0	1.000 100.0%	—	330	173	+157
2	Air Force AF	8–5	.615 61.5%	5–3	386	204	+182
3	Fresno State FRES	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	247	275	-28
4	Nevada NEV	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	261	225	+36
5	Wyoming WYO	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	134	181	-47
6	Hawaii —	6–7	.462 46.2%	3–5	296	383	-87
7	San Diego State SDSU	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	161	192	-31
8	Nevada Las Vegas —	5–7	.417 41.7%	3–5	298	389	-91
9	Colorado State CSU	2–5	.286 28.6%	—	162	183	-21
10	San Jose State —	2–10	.167 16.7%	1–7	165	414	-249
11	Utah State USU	1–5	.167 16.7%	—	137	194	-57
12	New Mexico UNM	1–7	.125 12.5%	—	144	281	-137

Conference race

Sun Belt - East

5 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Appalachian State —	11–3	.786 78.6%	8–0	465	313	+152
2	Marshall MRSH	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	129	160	-31
3	Georgia Southern GASO	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	12	42	-30
4	James Madison JMU	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	35	38	-3
5	Coastal Carolina CCU	0–2	.000 0.0%	—	3	67	-64

Conference race

Sun Belt - West

5 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Troy TROY	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	339	322	+17
2	Louisiana UL	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	204	280	-76
3	Southern Mississippi —	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	301	245	+56
4	Louisiana Monroe —	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	230	290	-60
5	Arkansas State ARST	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	197	241	-44

Conference race

MAC

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Central Michigan CMU	10–2	.833 83.3%	—	383	224	+159
2	Ohio OHIO	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	274	260	+14
3	Northern Illinois NIU	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	270	191	+79
4	Bowling Green BGSU	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	293	300	-7
5	Toledo TOL	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	332	421	-89
6	Kent State KENT	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	202	250	-48
7	Western Michigan WMU	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	224	294	-70
8	Akron AKR	3–9	.250 25.0%	2–6	231	345	-114
9	Buffalo BUF	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	167	225	-58
10	Ball State BALL	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	214	315	-101
11	Miami Ohio —	1–11	.083 8.3%	1–7	187	410	-223
12	Eastern Michigan EMU	0–12	.000 0.0%	—	197	459	-262

Conference race

CUSA

9 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Middle Tennessee State —	10–3	.769 76.9%	7–1	416	308	+108
2	Texas El Paso —	4–8	.333 33.3%	3–5	358	402	-44
3	Florida International FIU	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	254	376	-122
4	New Mexico State NMSU	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	94	297	-203
5	Louisiana Tech LT	1–6	.143 14.3%	—	170	211	-41
6	Liberty LIB	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	20	33	-13
7	Sam Houston State —	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	3	56	-53
8	Jacksonville State JXST	0–2	.000 0.0%	—	26	56	-30
9	Western Kentucky WKU	0–10	.000 0.0%	—	214	385	-171

Conference race

FBS Indep.

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Connecticut —	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	333	290	+43
2	Notre Dame ND	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	334	277	+57

College football standings guide

What are college football standings?

College football standings are FBS conference tables that rank teams by win percentage using overall and conference records. FantasyHQ’s 2009 board covers 12 conferences and 125 teams, with archive seasons available, plus filters for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and every other FBS league.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

How to use

Choose a season — current year when LIVE, or an archive year.
Filter with a conference chip or stay on All for every FBS table.
Read overall record, conference mark, and win % — then open a team page.

Related tools

CFB rankings — AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP boards.
CFB Playoff Predictor — project the CFP field from today’s races.
College football schedule — remaining games that move these tables.
FBS team football schedules — school hubs with records and SOS.
CFB Stat Leaders — who is driving conference races.
College Football HQ — portal, Heisman, teams, and more.

Frequently asked questions

Where can I find 2009 college football standings?

Open FantasyHQ college football standings at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings for every FBS conference in 2009, or pick a chip for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and more.

What do overall and conference records mean in CFB standings?

Overall is the team’s full-season W–L. Conference is wins and losses against league opponents only — the mark that usually decides the conference race and championship-game seeds.

How often are college football standings updated?

Standings refresh with the CFB HQ data pipeline after games finalize. This page was last labeled August 24, 2026.

How do conference standings affect the College Football Playoff?

Conference champions and top at-large teams from strong leagues feed the CFP field. Use FantasyHQ’s Playoff Predictor at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/playoff-predictor to project the bracket from current races.

Are FantasyHQ CFB standings free?

Yes. College football standings, team pages, schedule, and the playoff predictor are free to use in the browser — no download required.

Can I browse historical college football standings?

Yes. Open season archives like https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017 or pick a year on the standings board (2000–present), then filter by conference (for example https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017/sec).