CFB Standings 2006 — College Football Conference Tables

College Football

Season

Conference board · 2006

FBS conference standings

2006 archive — ranked by win % per conference. Affiliation uses modern FBS labels.

How to read this table

Teams are sorted by win percentage, then total wins — not alphabetically.

Overall: Season wins–losses in all games.
Win %: Wins ÷ games (ties = half a win). Rank uses this first.
Conf: Wins–losses vs conference opponents only.
PF / PA / Diff: Points scored, allowed, and differential (PF − PA).

Conferences 12

Teams 123

Season 2006

Archive 2006

Conference leaders

Conference race

SEC

15 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Florida FLA	9–1	.900 90.0%	—	248	165	+83
2	Louisiana State —	11–2	.846 84.6%	6–2	438	164	+274
3	Tennessee TENN	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	328	206	+122
4	Texas TEX	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	434	202	+232
5	Auburn AUB	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	275	147	+128
6	Oklahoma OU	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	282	166	+116
7	Arkansas ARK	10–4	.714 71.4%	7–1	404	256	+148
8	Missouri MIZ	6–3	.667 66.7%	—	253	176	+77
9	Georgia UGA	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	248	196	+52
10	Kentucky UK	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	288	286	+2
11	South Carolina SC	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	223	180	+43
12	Mississippi —	4–8	.333 33.3%	2–6	188	275	-87
13	Vanderbilt VAN	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	216	258	-42
14	Mississippi State MSST	2–7	.222 22.2%	—	171	231	-60
15	Alabama ALA	0–7	.000 0.0%	0–6	298	250	+48

Conference race

Big Ten

18 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Ohio State OSU	12–0	1.000 100.0%	—	436	125	+311
2	Michigan MICH	11–1	.917 91.7%	—	362	175	+187
3	Wisconsin WIS	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	329	133	+196
4	Southern California —	11–2	.846 84.6%	7–2	396	197	+199
5	Rutgers RUTG	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	294	169	+125
6	Nebraska NEB	7–3	.700 70.0%	—	320	177	+143
7	Penn State PSU	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	233	174	+59
8	Oregon ORE	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	310	260	+50
9	Purdue PUR	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	224	242	-18
10	Maryland MD	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	183	233	-50
11	UCLA UCLA	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	259	206	+53
12	Indiana IU	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	249	359	-110
13	Iowa IOWA	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	245	236	+9
14	Minnesota MINN	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	325	285	+40
15	Washington WASH	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	207	256	-49
16	Northwestern NU	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	160	277	-117
17	Michigan State MSU	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	275	324	-49
18	Illinois ILL	1–10	.091 9.1%	—	193	304	-111

Conference race

Big 12

16 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Brigham Young —	11–2	.846 84.6%	8–0	478	191	+287
2	Texas Christian —	11–2	.846 84.6%	6–2	380	160	+220
3	West Virginia WVU	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	415	244	+171
4	Houston HOU	6–3	.667 66.7%	—	262	188	+74
5	Kansas State KSU	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	262	249	+13
6	Arizona State ASU	7–6	.538 53.8%	4–5	348	326	+22
7	Arizona ARIZ	6–6	.500 50.0%	4–5	199	235	-36
8	Cincinnati CIN	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	192	221	-29
9	Kansas KU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	281	267	+14
10	Oklahoma State OKST	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	339	258	+81
11	Utah UTAH	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	197	175	+22
12	Texas Tech TTU	3–4	.429 42.9%	—	209	208	+1
13	Central Florida —	4–8	.333 33.3%	3–5	232	345	-113
14	Baylor BAY	3–6	.333 33.3%	—	208	333	-125
15	Iowa State ISU	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	182	332	-150
16	Colorado COLO	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	186	248	-62

Conference race

ACC

17 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Louisville LOU	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	423	182	+241
2	Virginia Tech VT	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	274	112	+162
3	Wake Forest WAKE	9–2	.818 81.8%	—	237	165	+72
4	California CAL	8–2	.800 80.0%	—	331	202	+129
5	Boston College BC	7–2	.778 77.8%	—	246	140	+106
6	Clemson CLEM	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	385	168	+217
7	Georgia Tech GT	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	245	190	+55
8	Florida State FSU	6–5	.545 54.5%	—	281	207	+74
9	Southern Methodist —	6–6	.500 50.0%	3–3	325	294	+31
10	Miami MIA	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	183	171	+12
11	Pittsburgh PITT	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	278	261	+17
12	Virginia UVA	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	167	207	-40
13	Syracuse SYR	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	175	281	-106
14	North Carolina State —	3–9	.250 25.0%	2–6	210	262	-52
15	North Carolina UNC	1–9	.100 10.0%	—	148	315	-167
16	Stanford STAN	1–9	.100 10.0%	—	93	300	-207
17	Duke DUKE	0–11	.000 0.0%	—	179	393	-214

Conference race

Pac-12

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Oregon State ORST	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	188	193	-5
2	Washington State WSU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	217	239	-22

Conference race

American

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Tulsa TLSA	6–2	.750 75.0%	—	224	127	+97
2	Navy NAVY	8–3	.727 72.7%	—	322	216	+106
3	South Florida USF	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	210	186	+24
4	East Carolina ECU	4–4	.500 50.0%	—	179	182	-3
5	Florida Atlantic FAU	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	135	257	-122
6	Rice RICE	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	191	271	-80
7	Tulane TULN	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	159	275	-116
8	Alabama Birmingham —	3–9	.250 25.0%	2–5	225	297	-72
9	Army ARMY	2–7	.222 22.2%	—	129	269	-140
10	North Texas UNT	2–8	.200 20.0%	—	130	263	-133
11	Temple TEM	1–11	.083 8.3%	—	131	496	-365
12	Memphis MEM	0–7	.000 0.0%	—	132	243	-111

Conference race

Mountain West

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Boise State BOIS	8–0	1.000 100.0%	—	322	107	+215
2	Hawaii —	11–3	.786 78.6%	6–1	656	337	+319
3	San Jose State —	9–4	.692 69.2%	4–3	324	270	+54
4	Nevada NEV	5–3	.625 62.5%	—	238	170	+68
5	New Mexico UNM	4–3	.571 57.1%	—	163	157	+6
6	Wyoming WYO	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	214	157	+57
7	Fresno State FRES	3–5	.375 37.5%	—	185	209	-24
8	Air Force AF	4–8	.333 33.3%	3–5	279	302	-23
9	San Diego State SDSU	2–4	.333 33.3%	—	81	138	-57
10	Colorado State CSU	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	127	181	-54
11	Nevada Las Vegas —	2–10	.167 16.7%	1–7	238	382	-144
12	Utah State USU	1–7	.125 12.5%	—	85	299	-214

Conference race

Sun Belt - East

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Appalachian State —	14–1	.933 93.3%	0–0	528	223	+305
2	Marshall MRSH	2–5	.286 28.6%	—	134	221	-87

Conference race

Sun Belt - West

6 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Louisiana UL	5–3	.625 62.5%	—	170	159	+11
2	Arkansas State ARST	6–4	.600 60.0%	—	163	196	-33
3	Troy TROY	5–4	.556 55.6%	—	193	231	-38
4	Southern Mississippi —	4–5	.444 44.4%	—	202	202	0
5	Louisiana Monroe —	3–7	.300 30.0%	—	217	226	-9
6	Texas State TXST	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	7	41	-34

Conference race

MAC

12 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Central Michigan CMU	9–4	.692 69.2%	—	385	298	+87
2	Ohio OHIO	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	206	198	+8
3	Western Michigan WMU	7–4	.636 63.6%	—	248	208	+40
4	Northern Illinois NIU	5–5	.500 50.0%	—	248	199	+49
5	Kent State KENT	5–6	.455 45.5%	—	198	227	-29
6	Akron AKR	5–7	.417 41.7%	3–5	236	271	-35
7	Ball State BALL	4–6	.400 40.0%	—	282	263	+19
8	Bowling Green BGSU	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	227	331	-104
9	Toledo TOL	4–7	.364 36.4%	—	240	325	-85
10	Buffalo BUF	2–9	.182 18.2%	—	189	393	-204
11	Miami Ohio —	2–10	.167 16.7%	2–6	222	304	-82
12	Eastern Michigan EMU	1–11	.083 8.3%	—	167	322	-155

Conference race

CUSA

9 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Middle Tennessee State —	7–6	.538 53.8%	6–1	296	302	-6
2	Texas El Paso —	5–7	.417 41.7%	3–5	328	375	-47
3	New Mexico State NMSU	2–4	.333 33.3%	—	187	188	-1
4	Louisiana Tech LT	2–6	.250 25.0%	—	156	347	-191
5	Jacksonville State JXST	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	3	35	-32
6	Liberty LIB	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	14	34	-20
7	Sam Houston State —	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	3	56	-53
8	Western Kentucky WKU	0–1	.000 0.0%	—	12	48	-36
9	Florida International FIU	0–11	.000 0.0%	—	109	306	-197

Conference race

FBS Indep.

2 teams · by win % Open

Overall = all games · Conf = conference only · #1 highlighted

# Rank	Team School	Overall W–L	Win % Sort	Conf W–L	PF Scored	PA Allowed	Diff PF−PA
1	Notre Dame ND	10–1	.909 90.9%	—	365	225	+140
2	Connecticut —	3–8	.273 27.3%	—	205	317	-112

College football standings guide

What are college football standings?

College football standings are FBS conference tables that rank teams by win percentage using overall and conference records. FantasyHQ’s 2006 board covers 12 conferences and 123 teams, with archive seasons available, plus filters for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and every other FBS league.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

How to use

Choose a season — current year when LIVE, or an archive year.
Filter with a conference chip or stay on All for every FBS table.
Read overall record, conference mark, and win % — then open a team page.

Related tools

CFB rankings — AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP boards.
CFB Playoff Predictor — project the CFP field from today’s races.
College football schedule — remaining games that move these tables.
FBS team football schedules — school hubs with records and SOS.
CFB Stat Leaders — who is driving conference races.
College Football HQ — portal, Heisman, teams, and more.

Frequently asked questions

Where can I find 2006 college football standings?

Open FantasyHQ college football standings at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings for every FBS conference in 2006, or pick a chip for SEC, Big Ten, ACC, Big 12, and more.

What do overall and conference records mean in CFB standings?

Overall is the team’s full-season W–L. Conference is wins and losses against league opponents only — the mark that usually decides the conference race and championship-game seeds.

How often are college football standings updated?

Standings refresh with the CFB HQ data pipeline after games finalize. This page was last labeled August 24, 2026.

How do conference standings affect the College Football Playoff?

Conference champions and top at-large teams from strong leagues feed the CFP field. Use FantasyHQ’s Playoff Predictor at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/playoff-predictor to project the bracket from current races.

Are FantasyHQ CFB standings free?

Yes. College football standings, team pages, schedule, and the playoff predictor are free to use in the browser — no download required.

Can I browse historical college football standings?

Yes. Open season archives like https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017 or pick a year on the standings board (2000–present), then filter by conference (for example https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/standings/2017/sec).