Overall #1
+0.397 Off PPA
CollegeFootballData predicted points · 2014
Offense PPA is higher-better. Defense PPA is lower-better (points allowed per play).
Overall #1
+0.397 Off PPA
Best defense
-0.051 Def PPA
| # | Team | Conf | Off PPA | Def PPA | Games |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.397 | 0.120 | 15 |
| 2 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.361 | 0.152 | 12 |
| 3 |
|
ACC | 0.343 | 0.164 | 14 |
| 4 |
|
Conference USA | 0.326 | 0.060 | 14 |
| 5 |
|
Conference USA | 0.323 | 0.228 | 13 |
| 6 |
|
Big 12 | 0.322 | 0.082 | 13 |
| 7 |
|
Mountain West | 0.317 | 0.168 | 12 |
| 8 |
|
SEC | 0.312 | 0.105 | 13 |
| 9 |
|
Big Ten | 0.305 | 0.079 | 15 |
| 10 |
|
SEC | 0.303 | 0.016 | 14 |
| 11 |
|
Big Ten | 0.296 | 0.052 | 13 |
| 12 |
|
Mid-American | 0.273 | 0.164 | 12 |
| 13 |
|
SEC | 0.270 | 0.132 | 13 |
| 14 |
|
FBS Independents | 0.268 | 0.184 | 13 |
| 15 |
|
American Athletic | 0.264 | 0.159 | 12 |
| 16 |
|
Mid-American | 0.256 | 0.073 | 12 |
| 17 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.255 | 0.097 | 12 |
| 18 |
|
Conference USA | 0.255 | 0.297 | 11 |
| 19 |
|
Big 12 | 0.253 | 0.130 | 13 |
| 20 |
|
Big 12 | 0.247 | 0.282 | 12 |
| 21 |
|
SEC | 0.246 | 0.072 | 13 |
| 22 |
|
ACC | 0.246 | 0.104 | 14 |
| 23 |
|
Mountain West | 0.244 | 0.046 | 14 |
| 24 |
|
Big Ten | 0.244 | 0.054 | 14 |
| 25 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.244 | 0.248 | 12 |
| 26 |
|
Big 12 | 0.235 | -0.012 | 13 |
| 27 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.232 | 0.102 | 13 |
| 28 |
|
ACC | 0.230 | 0.092 | 13 |
| 29 |
|
American Athletic | 0.228 | 0.098 | 13 |
| 30 |
|
ACC | 0.220 | 0.142 | 13 |
| 31 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.220 | 0.163 | 12 |
| 32 |
|
Conference USA | 0.219 | 0.038 | 13 |
| 33 |
|
SEC | 0.217 | 0.074 | 13 |
| 34 |
|
SEC | 0.213 | 0.199 | 13 |
| 35 |
|
Mid-American | 0.211 | 0.198 | 11 |
| 36 |
|
ACC | 0.208 | 0.250 | 11 |
| 37 |
|
Mid-American | 0.204 | 0.135 | 14 |
| 38 |
|
Mountain West | 0.204 | 0.280 | 12 |
| 39 |
|
Big 12 | 0.200 | 0.091 | 13 |
| 40 |
|
FBS Independents | 0.199 | 0.085 | 13 |
| 41 |
|
SEC | 0.194 | 0.168 | 13 |
| 42 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.193 | 0.258 | 12 |
| 43 |
|
American Athletic | 0.188 | 0.045 | 13 |
| 44 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.184 | 0.050 | 13 |
| 45 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.184 | 0.163 | 13 |
| 46 |
|
Conference USA | 0.178 | 0.185 | 11 |
| 47 |
|
FBS Independents | 0.178 | 0.172 | 13 |
| 48 |
|
Mountain West | 0.176 | 0.126 | 13 |
| 49 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.176 | 0.118 | 12 |
| 50 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.176 | 0.153 | 14 |
| 51 |
|
ACC | 0.175 | 0.095 | 13 |
| 52 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.174 | 0.066 | 12 |
| 53 |
|
Big Ten | 0.172 | 0.093 | 13 |
| 54 |
|
Conference USA | 0.171 | 0.173 | 13 |
| 55 |
|
Big Ten | 0.170 | 0.096 | 13 |
| 56 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.169 | 0.012 | 13 |
| 57 |
|
FBS Independents | 0.169 | 0.245 | 12 |
| 58 |
|
Mid-American | 0.166 | 0.102 | 13 |
| 59 |
|
Big Ten | 0.162 | 0.132 | 11 |
| 60 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.159 | 0.121 | 13 |
| 61 |
|
ACC | 0.156 | 0.268 | 13 |
| 62 |
|
Big 12 | 0.153 | 0.081 | 13 |
| 63 |
|
ACC | 0.152 | -0.017 | 13 |
| 64 |
|
Big Ten | 0.146 | 0.248 | 13 |
| 65 |
|
SEC | 0.144 | 0.045 | 14 |
| 66 |
|
Mountain West | 0.142 | 0.150 | 12 |
| 67 |
|
Mountain West | 0.135 | 0.142 | 11 |
| 68 |
|
Big Ten | 0.133 | 0.117 | 13 |
| 69 |
|
Mountain West | 0.131 | 0.026 | 14 |
| 70 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.128 | 0.241 | 12 |
| 71 |
|
Mid-American | 0.128 | 0.163 | 12 |
| 72 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.128 | 0.262 | 12 |
| 73 |
|
ACC | 0.127 | 0.089 | 13 |
| 74 |
|
Mid-American | 0.124 | 0.167 | 12 |
| 75 |
|
Mid-American | 0.124 | 0.182 | 12 |
| 76 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.116 | 0.105 | 13 |
| 77 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.116 | 0.307 | 10 |
| 78 |
|
Mid-American | 0.114 | 0.163 | 14 |
| 79 |
|
American Athletic | 0.114 | 0.022 | 13 |
| 80 |
|
SEC | 0.114 | -0.010 | 13 |
| 81 |
|
Mountain West | 0.114 | 0.095 | 13 |
| 82 |
|
SEC | 0.112 | -0.044 | 13 |
| 83 |
|
Pac-12 | 0.107 | 0.198 | 12 |
| 84 |
|
Conference USA | 0.107 | 0.272 | 9 |
| 85 |
|
Conference USA | 0.098 | 0.130 | 11 |
| 86 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.096 | 0.279 | 11 |
| 87 |
|
SEC | 0.095 | 0.126 | 12 |
| 88 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.092 | 0.338 | 11 |
| 89 |
|
ACC | 0.090 | -0.051 | 13 |
| 90 |
|
Big 12 | 0.088 | 0.161 | 13 |
| 91 |
|
Mountain West | 0.086 | 0.213 | 14 |
| 92 |
|
American Athletic | 0.083 | -0.009 | 13 |
| 93 |
|
Mountain West | 0.082 | 0.233 | 12 |
| 94 |
|
American Athletic | 0.082 | 0.273 | 12 |
| 95 |
|
Big Ten | 0.081 | 0.081 | 12 |
| 96 |
|
Conference USA | 0.080 | 0.170 | 12 |
| 97 |
|
SEC | 0.078 | 0.106 | 13 |
| 98 |
|
Big Ten | 0.077 | 0.141 | 12 |
| 99 |
|
Big Ten | 0.075 | 0.194 | 13 |
| 100 |
|
Mountain West | 0.072 | 0.268 | 13 |
| 101 |
|
Big 12 | 0.070 | 0.269 | 12 |
| 102 |
|
Conference USA | 0.070 | 0.201 | 13 |
| 103 |
|
Mid-American | 0.063 | 0.145 | 12 |
| 104 |
|
Mountain West | 0.060 | 0.176 | 11 |
| 105 |
|
SEC | 0.060 | -0.017 | 12 |
| 106 |
|
Big 12 | 0.055 | 0.025 | 13 |
| 107 |
|
Big Ten | 0.052 | 0.117 | 12 |
| 108 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.050 | 0.164 | 12 |
| 109 |
|
ACC | 0.050 | 0.020 | 13 |
| 110 |
|
ACC | 0.047 | 0.070 | 12 |
| 111 |
|
Conference USA | 0.040 | 0.124 | 11 |
| 112 |
|
Mid-American | 0.034 | 0.098 | 12 |
| 113 |
|
Big Ten | 0.027 | 0.092 | 12 |
| 114 |
|
Big 12 | 0.024 | 0.192 | 12 |
| 115 |
|
Mid-American | 0.016 | 0.158 | 11 |
| 116 |
|
American Athletic | 0.012 | 0.106 | 12 |
| 117 |
|
Sun Belt | 0.010 | 0.096 | 12 |
| 118 |
|
ACC | 0.007 | 0.050 | 12 |
| 119 |
|
American Athletic | -0.001 | 0.118 | 12 |
| 120 |
|
Conference USA | -0.001 | 0.052 | 10 |
| 121 |
|
Big Ten | -0.005 | -0.042 | 13 |
| 122 |
|
American Athletic | -0.014 | -0.017 | 12 |
| 123 |
|
Conference USA | -0.018 | 0.104 | 12 |
| 124 |
|
American Athletic | -0.028 | 0.130 | 11 |
| 125 |
|
American Athletic | -0.043 | 0.279 | 12 |
| 126 |
|
Mid-American | -0.053 | 0.296 | 11 |
| 127 |
|
SEC | -0.064 | 0.173 | 12 |
| 128 |
|
ACC | -0.111 | 0.083 | 12 |
College football power rankings guide
Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2014 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.
Last updated: August 24, 2026
Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2014 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.
ESPN FPI is a proprietary power index. FantasyHQ publishes free SP+, EPA, and PPA boards you can cross-check with FPI. For voter/committee ranks, use CFB Rankings (AP Top 25 / CFP) — not this page.
FantasyHQ CFB power rankings use SP+ (and EPA / PPA boards) to rank teams by efficiency, not just record. Open https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-analytics/leaderboards for the 2014 table with offense, defense, and special teams splits.
SP+ is an opponent-adjusted rating from Bill Connelly that estimates how many points better (or worse) a team is than average. Higher overall and offensive SP+ is better; lower defensive SP+ is better.
ESPN FPI is ESPN’s proprietary Football Power Index. FantasyHQ publishes SP+, EPA per play, and PPA boards from CFBD and play-by-play data — a free efficiency view you can cross-check with FPI, the AP Top 25, and CFP rankings. We do not claim to reproduce ESPN FPI.
SP+ is a season-long opponent-adjusted team rating. EPA measures expected points added per play from FantasyHQ play-by-play. PPA (predicted points added) averages game-level efficiency from CollegeFootballData. Switch metrics on the leaderboards page to compare the same season three ways.
No. AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP rankings live on FantasyHQ’s CFB Rankings board at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/rankings. Leaderboards here are analytics power boards (SP+ / EPA / PPA), not voter or committee polls.
Yes. SP+, EPA, and PPA team leaderboards, box scores, standings, and schedule tools are free to use in the browser.