FantasyHQ+
College Football

CollegeFootballData predicted points · 2013

Predicted Points Added

Offense PPA is higher-better. Defense PPA is lower-better (points allowed per play).

SP+ power rankings EPA efficiency PPA / game
# Team Conf Off PPA Def PPA Games
1 Florida State ACC 0.281 -0.044 14
2 Louisville American Athletic 0.215 -0.010 13
3 Texas A&M SEC 0.213 0.126 13
4 Oregon Pac-12 0.208 0.003 13
5 Bowling Green Mid-American 0.199 0.046 14
6 Georgia SEC 0.197 0.066 13
7 LSU SEC 0.196 0.067 13
8 Ohio State Big Ten 0.194 0.067 14
9 Alabama SEC 0.184 -0.013 13
10 South Carolina SEC 0.179 0.077 13
11 Baylor Big 12 0.172 -0.050 13
12 Western Kentucky Sun Belt 0.169 0.087 12
13 Georgia Tech ACC 0.162 0.099 13
14 Marshall Conference USA 0.160 0.017 14
15 Auburn SEC 0.159 0.119 14
16 Washington Pac-12 0.157 0.026 13
17 Northern Illinois Mid-American 0.156 0.076 14
18 East Carolina Conference USA 0.155 0.055 13
19 UCLA Pac-12 0.152 0.112 13
20 Wisconsin Big Ten 0.148 0.003 13
21 Clemson ACC 0.146 0.018 13
22 Fresno State Mountain West 0.145 0.067 13
23 Troy Sun Belt 0.140 0.134 12
24 New Mexico Mountain West 0.140 0.223 12
25 Kansas State Big 12 0.139 0.055 13
26 Army FBS Independents 0.139 0.116 12
27 Colorado State Mountain West 0.136 0.034 14
28 Temple American Athletic 0.133 0.132 12
29 Pittsburgh ACC 0.133 0.064 13
30 San José State Mountain West 0.130 0.136 12
31 Navy FBS Independents 0.128 0.125 13
32 Boise State Mountain West 0.125 0.088 13
33 UTSA Conference USA 0.125 0.077 12
34 Texas Tech Big 12 0.124 0.035 13
35 Missouri SEC 0.121 0.096 14
36 Cincinnati American Athletic 0.120 0.066 13
37 Oregon State Pac-12 0.118 0.123 13
38 Louisiana Sun Belt 0.117 0.073 13
39 Ball State Mid-American 0.116 0.085 13
40 UCF American Athletic 0.115 0.089 13
41 Illinois Big Ten 0.113 0.131 12
42 UAB Conference USA 0.113 0.201 12
43 SMU American Athletic 0.109 0.095 12
44 BYU FBS Independents 0.108 0.006 13
45 USC Pac-12 0.107 -0.006 14
46 Wyoming Mountain West 0.107 0.130 12
47 Penn State Big Ten 0.106 0.058 12
48 Mississippi State SEC 0.105 0.082 13
49 Ole Miss SEC 0.105 0.064 13
50 Indiana Big Ten 0.103 0.170 12
51 Northwestern Big Ten 0.102 0.079 12
52 Vanderbilt SEC 0.101 0.051 13
53 North Carolina ACC 0.100 0.062 13
54 Air Force Mountain West 0.098 0.208 12
55 Arizona Pac-12 0.098 0.031 13
56 Miami ACC 0.098 0.107 13
57 Nebraska Big Ten 0.097 0.027 13
58 Stanford Pac-12 0.096 0.056 14
59 Nevada Mountain West 0.095 0.206 12
60 Minnesota Big Ten 0.092 0.083 13
61 Arkansas SEC 0.089 0.144 12
62 Toledo Mid-American 0.088 0.182 12
63 Arizona State Pac-12 0.086 0.092 14
64 Arkansas State Sun Belt 0.085 0.078 13
65 South Alabama Sun Belt 0.085 0.100 12
66 Michigan Big Ten 0.083 0.041 13
67 Duke ACC 0.081 0.091 14
68 Notre Dame FBS Independents 0.075 0.063 13
69 Utah State Mountain West 0.073 -0.005 14
70 Oklahoma State Big 12 0.072 -0.007 13
71 Rice Conference USA 0.071 0.046 14
72 Oklahoma Big 12 0.068 0.033 13
73 Utah Pac-12 0.066 0.083 12
74 New Mexico State FBS Independents 0.065 0.177 12
75 San Diego State Mountain West 0.061 0.067 13
76 Buffalo Mid-American 0.060 0.022 13
77 Kent State Mid-American 0.060 0.118 12
78 Central Michigan Mid-American 0.057 0.104 12
79 Middle Tennessee Conference USA 0.053 0.114 13
80 Louisiana Tech Conference USA 0.052 0.040 12
81 Washington State Pac-12 0.052 0.058 13
82 North Texas Conference USA 0.052 0.049 13
83 Boston College ACC 0.048 0.123 13
84 NC State ACC 0.048 0.103 12
85 Kentucky SEC 0.048 0.166 12
86 Florida Atlantic Conference USA 0.048 -0.011 12
87 Maryland ACC 0.047 0.032 13
88 California Pac-12 0.046 0.123 12
89 Houston American Athletic 0.043 0.058 13
90 Rutgers American Athletic 0.042 0.122 13
91 Michigan State Big Ten 0.041 -0.060 14
92 Georgia State Sun Belt 0.040 0.115 12
93 Iowa Big Ten 0.040 -0.013 13
94 Ohio Mid-American 0.039 0.115 13
95 Virginia Tech ACC 0.038 -0.031 13
96 Florida SEC 0.038 0.034 12
97 Idaho FBS Independents 0.036 0.132 12
98 West Virginia Big 12 0.033 0.068 12
99 UTEP Conference USA 0.032 0.158 12
100 Memphis American Athletic 0.031 0.044 12
101 UNLV Mountain West 0.031 0.088 13
102 Syracuse ACC 0.030 0.039 13
103 Akron Mid-American 0.027 0.069 12
104 Iowa State Big 12 0.023 0.074 12
105 Eastern Michigan Mid-American 0.017 0.164 12
106 Tennessee SEC 0.016 0.141 12
107 Purdue Big Ten 0.014 0.128 12
108 Hawai'i Mountain West 0.013 0.089 12
109 UConn American Athletic 0.011 0.033 12
110 UL Monroe Sun Belt 0.007 0.046 12
111 Tulsa Conference USA 0.007 0.057 12
112 Texas State Sun Belt 0.002 0.063 12
113 South Florida American Athletic -0.000 0.037 12
114 Colorado Pac-12 -0.003 0.092 12
115 Wake Forest ACC -0.003 0.023 12
116 Tulane Conference USA -0.005 0.028 13
117 Texas Big 12 -0.006 0.066 13
118 TCU Big 12 -0.014 -0.011 12
119 Virginia ACC -0.015 0.023 12
120 Western Michigan Mid-American -0.021 0.104 12
121 Miami (OH) Mid-American -0.028 0.152 12
122 Massachusetts Mid-American -0.038 0.095 12
123 Kansas Big 12 -0.051 0.069 12
124 Southern Miss Conference USA -0.060 0.098 12
125 Florida International Conference USA -0.068 0.113 12

College football power rankings guide

What are CFB power rankings?

Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2013 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2013 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.

How to use

  1. Pick a season, then choose SP+, EPA, or PPA.
  2. Filter a conference when you want a league-only board.
  3. Read offense vs defense splits — then open a team page or box score.

vs ESPN FPI & polls

ESPN FPI is a proprietary power index. FantasyHQ publishes free SP+, EPA, and PPA boards you can cross-check with FPI. For voter/committee ranks, use CFB Rankings (AP Top 25 / CFP) — not this page.

Related tools

Frequently asked questions

What are 2013 CFB power rankings on FantasyHQ?

FantasyHQ CFB power rankings use SP+ (and EPA / PPA boards) to rank teams by efficiency, not just record. Open https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-analytics/leaderboards for the 2013 table with offense, defense, and special teams splits.

What is SP+ in college football?

SP+ is an opponent-adjusted rating from Bill Connelly that estimates how many points better (or worse) a team is than average. Higher overall and offensive SP+ is better; lower defensive SP+ is better.

How is this different from ESPN FPI?

ESPN FPI is ESPN’s proprietary Football Power Index. FantasyHQ publishes SP+, EPA per play, and PPA boards from CFBD and play-by-play data — a free efficiency view you can cross-check with FPI, the AP Top 25, and CFP rankings. We do not claim to reproduce ESPN FPI.

What is the difference between SP+, EPA, and PPA?

SP+ is a season-long opponent-adjusted team rating. EPA measures expected points added per play from FantasyHQ play-by-play. PPA (predicted points added) averages game-level efficiency from CollegeFootballData. Switch metrics on the leaderboards page to compare the same season three ways.

Is this the same as AP Top 25 or CFB rankings?

No. AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP rankings live on FantasyHQ’s CFB Rankings board at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/rankings. Leaderboards here are analytics power boards (SP+ / EPA / PPA), not voter or committee polls.

Are FantasyHQ CFB analytics leaderboards free?

Yes. SP+, EPA, and PPA team leaderboards, box scores, standings, and schedule tools are free to use in the browser.