FantasyHQ+
College Football

CollegeFootballData predicted points · 2010

Predicted Points Added

Offense PPA is higher-better. Defense PPA is lower-better (points allowed per play).

SP+ power rankings EPA efficiency PPA / game
# Team Conf Off PPA Def PPA Games
1 Wisconsin Big Ten 0.212 0.058 13
2 Auburn SEC 0.176 0.043 14
3 Nevada Western Athletic 0.175 0.059 14
4 TCU Mountain West 0.170 -0.053 13
5 Alabama SEC 0.168 -0.017 13
6 Stanford Pac-10 0.158 0.009 13
7 Boise State Western Athletic 0.158 -0.089 13
8 Hawai'i Western Athletic 0.154 0.032 13
9 Oklahoma State Big 12 0.147 0.039 13
10 Michigan Big Ten 0.145 0.098 13
11 SMU Conference USA 0.144 0.053 14
12 Arkansas SEC 0.137 0.040 13
13 Air Force Mountain West 0.128 0.044 13
14 Iowa Big Ten 0.125 0.048 13
15 Baylor Big 12 0.123 0.107 13
16 Arizona Pac-10 0.123 0.014 13
17 Navy FBS Independents 0.119 0.116 13
18 Tulsa Conference USA 0.118 0.075 13
19 Houston Conference USA 0.115 0.111 12
20 Ohio State Big Ten 0.112 -0.048 13
21 South Carolina SEC 0.111 0.057 14
22 Oregon Pac-10 0.110 -0.057 13
23 Georgia SEC 0.108 0.022 13
24 Michigan State Big Ten 0.108 0.035 13
25 USC Pac-10 0.107 0.100 13
26 Virginia Tech ACC 0.103 0.017 14
27 East Carolina Conference USA 0.101 0.112 13
28 Southern Miss Conference USA 0.094 -0.006 12
29 North Carolina ACC 0.091 0.013 13
30 Florida State ACC 0.091 0.023 14
31 Northern Illinois Mid-American 0.089 -0.002 14
32 UCF Conference USA 0.086 0.012 13
33 Arkansas State Sun Belt 0.084 0.073 9
34 Texas Tech Big 12 0.082 0.069 13
35 Nebraska Big 12 0.081 -0.041 14
36 Idaho Western Athletic 0.080 0.060 10
37 Kentucky SEC 0.080 0.086 13
38 Northwestern Big Ten 0.080 0.097 11
39 Kansas State Big 12 0.078 0.109 13
40 Illinois Big Ten 0.077 -0.008 13
41 San Diego State Mountain West 0.077 -0.014 13
42 Georgia Tech ACC 0.075 0.039 13
43 Mississippi State SEC 0.073 0.002 13
44 NC State ACC 0.072 0.043 13
45 Texas A&M Big 12 0.065 -0.046 13
46 Virginia ACC 0.065 0.060 12
47 Arizona State Pac-10 0.063 -0.028 12
48 Cincinnati Big East 0.063 0.015 12
49 Fresno State Western Athletic 0.057 0.034 12
50 Western Michigan Mid-American 0.057 0.027 12
51 Utah Mountain West 0.057 -0.002 13
52 Pittsburgh Big East 0.053 0.022 13
53 Colorado Big 12 0.053 0.094 12
54 Oklahoma Big 12 0.050 0.001 14
55 Army FBS Independents 0.047 0.043 12
56 West Virginia Big East 0.046 -0.083 13
57 UAB Conference USA 0.046 0.088 12
58 Penn State Big Ten 0.045 0.045 13
59 Central Michigan Mid-American 0.044 0.009 11
60 BYU Mountain West 0.043 -0.001 13
61 Missouri Big 12 0.042 0.007 12
62 Miami ACC 0.038 -0.022 13
63 Louisville Big East 0.038 0.025 13
64 Texas Big 12 0.037 -0.043 12
65 Troy Sun Belt 0.036 0.046 11
66 Florida International Sun Belt 0.035 -0.015 10
67 Indiana Big Ten 0.035 0.104 12
68 Rice Conference USA 0.034 0.136 12
69 Western Kentucky Sun Belt 0.033 0.121 10
70 Washington Pac-10 0.029 0.088 13
71 Utah State Western Athletic 0.029 0.071 12
72 Notre Dame FBS Independents 0.028 0.007 13
73 Syracuse Big East 0.026 -0.044 12
74 Ole Miss SEC 0.026 0.067 12
75 Minnesota Big Ten 0.023 0.120 12
76 UTEP Conference USA 0.023 0.125 12
77 North Texas Sun Belt 0.022 0.049 9
78 Oregon State Pac-10 0.021 0.095 12
79 UL Monroe Sun Belt 0.018 -0.010 11
80 South Florida Big East 0.018 -0.015 13
81 Duke ACC 0.017 0.130 12
82 Temple Mid-American 0.015 0.004 12
83 Tulane Conference USA 0.015 0.042 12
84 Washington State Pac-10 0.014 0.151 12
85 Memphis Conference USA 0.014 0.099 11
86 Ohio Mid-American 0.013 0.008 12
87 California Pac-10 0.013 0.017 12
88 Middle Tennessee Sun Belt 0.013 0.016 12
89 LSU SEC 0.011 -0.004 13
90 San José State Western Athletic 0.010 0.121 13
91 Iowa State Big 12 0.010 0.077 12
92 Colorado State Mountain West 0.010 0.126 12
93 Louisiana Tech Western Athletic 0.007 0.097 12
94 Florida SEC 0.001 -0.018 13
95 Tennessee SEC 0.001 0.022 13
96 UCLA Pac-10 -0.003 0.072 12
97 Maryland ACC -0.004 -0.023 13
98 Miami (OH) Mid-American -0.007 -0.048 14
99 Louisiana Sun Belt -0.008 0.046 12
100 UConn Big East -0.009 0.009 13
101 Toledo Mid-American -0.011 0.016 13
102 Clemson ACC -0.012 -0.018 13
103 Wake Forest ACC -0.020 0.096 12
104 Kent State Mid-American -0.025 -0.013 11
105 Kansas Big 12 -0.032 0.104 12
106 Florida Atlantic Sun Belt -0.036 0.049 10
107 UNLV Mountain West -0.038 0.135 13
108 Marshall Conference USA -0.042 0.023 12
109 Wyoming Mountain West -0.043 0.100 12
110 New Mexico State Western Athletic -0.047 0.122 10
111 Boston College ACC -0.048 -0.030 12
112 Rutgers Big East -0.051 0.032 12
113 Eastern Michigan Mid-American -0.052 0.095 11
114 Akron Mid-American -0.053 0.086 12
115 New Mexico Mountain West -0.058 0.083 12
116 Buffalo Mid-American -0.072 -0.056 12
117 Purdue Big Ten -0.072 0.065 12
118 Ball State Mid-American -0.073 0.047 12
119 Bowling Green Mid-American -0.082 0.081 11
120 Vanderbilt SEC -0.098 0.043 12

College football power rankings guide

What are CFB power rankings?

Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2010 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2010 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.

How to use

  1. Pick a season, then choose SP+, EPA, or PPA.
  2. Filter a conference when you want a league-only board.
  3. Read offense vs defense splits — then open a team page or box score.

vs ESPN FPI & polls

ESPN FPI is a proprietary power index. FantasyHQ publishes free SP+, EPA, and PPA boards you can cross-check with FPI. For voter/committee ranks, use CFB Rankings (AP Top 25 / CFP) — not this page.

Related tools

Frequently asked questions

What are 2010 CFB power rankings on FantasyHQ?

FantasyHQ CFB power rankings use SP+ (and EPA / PPA boards) to rank teams by efficiency, not just record. Open https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-analytics/leaderboards for the 2010 table with offense, defense, and special teams splits.

What is SP+ in college football?

SP+ is an opponent-adjusted rating from Bill Connelly that estimates how many points better (or worse) a team is than average. Higher overall and offensive SP+ is better; lower defensive SP+ is better.

How is this different from ESPN FPI?

ESPN FPI is ESPN’s proprietary Football Power Index. FantasyHQ publishes SP+, EPA per play, and PPA boards from CFBD and play-by-play data — a free efficiency view you can cross-check with FPI, the AP Top 25, and CFP rankings. We do not claim to reproduce ESPN FPI.

What is the difference between SP+, EPA, and PPA?

SP+ is a season-long opponent-adjusted team rating. EPA measures expected points added per play from FantasyHQ play-by-play. PPA (predicted points added) averages game-level efficiency from CollegeFootballData. Switch metrics on the leaderboards page to compare the same season three ways.

Is this the same as AP Top 25 or CFB rankings?

No. AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP rankings live on FantasyHQ’s CFB Rankings board at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/rankings. Leaderboards here are analytics power boards (SP+ / EPA / PPA), not voter or committee polls.

Are FantasyHQ CFB analytics leaderboards free?

Yes. SP+, EPA, and PPA team leaderboards, box scores, standings, and schedule tools are free to use in the browser.