2007 CFB PPA Rankings — Predicted Points Added

College Football

Season

CollegeFootballData predicted points · 2007

Predicted Points Added

Offense PPA is higher-better. Defense PPA is lower-better (points allowed per play).

SP+ power rankings EPA efficiency PPA / game

Conference

Overall #1

Florida

+0.208 Off PPA

Best defense

Oregon State

-0.112 Def PPA

#	Team	Conf	Off PPA	Def PPA	Games
1	Florida	SEC	0.208	0.050	13
2	Texas Tech	Big 12	0.173	0.007	12
3	Louisville	Big East	0.165	0.074	12
4	Tulsa	Conference USA	0.154	-0.020	9
5	Navy	FBS Independents	0.146	0.095	13
6	Hawai'i	Western Athletic	0.146	-0.038	13
7	Oklahoma State	Big 12	0.141	0.134	10
8	Western Kentucky	FBS Independents	0.138	0.022	10
9	Missouri	Big 12	0.128	0.023	14
10	West Virginia	Big East	0.126	-0.017	13
11	Kansas	Big 12	0.112	-0.057	13
12	Nebraska	Big 12	0.110	0.107	12
13	BYU	Mountain West	0.106	-0.041	12
14	Oklahoma	Big 12	0.104	0.001	14
15	Fresno State	Western Athletic	0.104	0.063	13
16	Texas	Big 12	0.098	0.022	13
17	Nevada	Western Athletic	0.097	0.059	12
18	Cincinnati	Big East	0.096	0.034	13
19	Air Force	Mountain West	0.096	0.048	12
20	Rutgers	Big East	0.092	0.009	13
21	Ball State	Mid-American	0.088	0.102	12
22	Houston	Conference USA	0.088	0.102	6
23	Wisconsin	Big Ten	0.087	0.052	13
24	California	Pac-10	0.087	0.030	13
25	Southern Miss	Conference USA	0.086	0.017	11
26	LSU	SEC	0.085	-0.071	14
27	Penn State	Big Ten	0.083	0.012	13
28	Illinois	Big Ten	0.082	0.028	13
29	Kentucky	SEC	0.082	0.065	13
30	Purdue	Big Ten	0.079	0.006	13
31	Toledo	Mid-American	0.077	0.053	11
32	Central Michigan	Mid-American	0.076	0.052	14
33	UTEP	Conference USA	0.072	0.063	6
34	Texas A&M	Big 12	0.071	0.137	12
35	Northwestern	Big Ten	0.070	0.046	12
36	Washington State	Pac-10	0.068	0.081	11
37	Clemson	ACC	0.066	0.011	12
38	Bowling Green	Mid-American	0.064	0.058	11
39	USC	Pac-10	0.062	-0.069	13
40	Boise State	Western Athletic	0.062	-0.042	13
41	Indiana	Big Ten	0.060	0.069	12
42	South Carolina	SEC	0.059	0.001	11
43	Michigan State	Big Ten	0.056	0.010	13
44	Georgia	SEC	0.055	0.021	13
45	Boston College	ACC	0.054	-0.022	14
46	Oregon	Pac-10	0.054	-0.033	13
47	Kansas State	Big 12	0.053	0.028	11
48	UCF	Conference USA	0.050	-0.005	12
49	Ohio State	Big Ten	0.048	-0.062	13
50	Memphis	Conference USA	0.047	0.097	10
51	Troy	Sun Belt	0.046	-0.042	11
52	SMU	Conference USA	0.046	0.104	8
53	San Diego State	Mountain West	0.042	0.129	9
54	Louisiana	Sun Belt	0.040	0.032	9
55	UL Monroe	Sun Belt	0.039	0.020	11
56	Colorado	Big 12	0.036	0.016	13
57	Florida Atlantic	Sun Belt	0.034	0.044	8
58	South Florida	Big East	0.033	-0.064	12
59	Buffalo	Mid-American	0.032	0.148	5
60	Kent State	Mid-American	0.029	0.049	8
61	Maryland	ACC	0.027	0.030	13
62	Auburn	SEC	0.027	-0.030	13
63	Western Michigan	Mid-American	0.027	-0.013	12
64	Alabama	SEC	0.027	0.023	12
65	Arizona State	Pac-10	0.025	-0.006	11
66	Georgia Tech	ACC	0.023	0.032	13
67	Minnesota	Big Ten	0.022	0.157	12
68	UNLV	Mountain West	0.022	0.050	11
69	Florida State	ACC	0.016	-0.002	13
70	Marshall	Conference USA	0.013	0.091	9
71	Ole Miss	SEC	0.013	0.068	11
72	Virginia	ACC	0.012	0.014	13
73	Tennessee	SEC	0.012	0.065	13
74	Utah	Mountain West	0.009	0.010	13
75	UAB	Conference USA	0.008	0.150	5
76	UConn	Big East	0.007	-0.005	12
77	Arkansas	SEC	0.007	-0.021	12
78	Colorado State	Mountain West	0.005	0.111	8
79	Michigan	Big Ten	0.003	-0.005	13
80	East Carolina	Conference USA	0.003	0.080	11
81	New Mexico State	Western Athletic	0.001	0.031	12
82	Arkansas State	Sun Belt	0.000	0.062	8
83	New Mexico	Mountain West	-0.001	-0.068	10
84	Idaho	Western Athletic	-0.002	0.131	8
85	Arizona	Pac-10	-0.003	0.011	11
86	Washington	Pac-10	-0.004	0.091	13
87	TCU	Mountain West	-0.005	-0.055	11
88	Iowa	Big Ten	-0.006	0.005	12
89	Ohio	Mid-American	-0.006	0.033	8
90	Middle Tennessee	Sun Belt	-0.006	0.048	11
91	Miami	ACC	-0.008	0.009	12
92	Virginia Tech	ACC	-0.010	-0.041	14
93	Wake Forest	ACC	-0.011	-0.028	12
94	Eastern Michigan	Mid-American	-0.013	0.101	12
95	Iowa State	Big 12	-0.014	0.082	12
96	Northern Illinois	Mid-American	-0.020	0.112	8
97	Utah State	Western Athletic	-0.021	0.098	11
98	North Carolina	ACC	-0.025	0.037	11
99	Wyoming	Mountain West	-0.026	-0.041	11
100	Stanford	Pac-10	-0.027	0.038	11
101	Tulane	Conference USA	-0.028	0.106	10
102	Temple	Mid-American	-0.030	0.076	8
103	NC State	ACC	-0.031	0.001	12
104	Baylor	Big 12	-0.032	0.109	11
105	Pittsburgh	Big East	-0.035	-0.008	12
106	Oregon State	Pac-10	-0.037	-0.112	11
107	UCLA	Pac-10	-0.038	-0.073	13
108	San José State	Western Athletic	-0.039	0.040	9
109	Vanderbilt	SEC	-0.044	0.034	11
110	Akron	Mid-American	-0.045	0.004	11
111	Rice	Conference USA	-0.047	0.198	6
112	Syracuse	Big East	-0.047	0.117	12
113	North Texas	Sun Belt	-0.051	0.053	9
114	Mississippi State	SEC	-0.053	-0.051	13
115	Miami (OH)	Mid-American	-0.067	0.024	9
116	Duke	ACC	-0.070	0.059	9
117	Notre Dame	FBS Independents	-0.083	0.002	12
118	Army	FBS Independents	-0.092	0.100	12
119	Louisiana Tech	Western Athletic	-0.107	-0.036	9
120	Florida International	Sun Belt	-0.121	0.117	10

College football power rankings guide

What are CFB power rankings?

Predicted Points Added (PPA) estimates scoring value created or allowed on each play. FantasyHQ’s 2007 PPA leaderboard averages offense and defense PPA across games so you can compare team efficiency beyond raw yards and points.

Last updated: August 24, 2026

Definition

How to use

Pick a season, then choose SP+, EPA, or PPA.
Filter a conference when you want a league-only board.
Read offense vs defense splits — then open a team page or box score.

vs ESPN FPI & polls

ESPN FPI is a proprietary power index. FantasyHQ publishes free SP+, EPA, and PPA boards you can cross-check with FPI. For voter/committee ranks, use CFB Rankings (AP Top 25 / CFP) — not this page.

Related tools

CFB rankings — AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP boards.
CFB standings — conference records and streaks.
CFB Playoff Predictor — project the CFP field.
CFB Box & Scores — game-level EPA and drive charts.
CFB Stat Leaders — yards, TDs, and defensive categories.
College football schedule — upcoming games that move these boards.

Frequently asked questions

What are 2007 CFB power rankings on FantasyHQ?

FantasyHQ CFB power rankings use SP+ (and EPA / PPA boards) to rank teams by efficiency, not just record. Open https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-analytics/leaderboards for the 2007 table with offense, defense, and special teams splits.

What is SP+ in college football?

SP+ is an opponent-adjusted rating from Bill Connelly that estimates how many points better (or worse) a team is than average. Higher overall and offensive SP+ is better; lower defensive SP+ is better.

How is this different from ESPN FPI?

ESPN FPI is ESPN’s proprietary Football Power Index. FantasyHQ publishes SP+, EPA per play, and PPA boards from CFBD and play-by-play data — a free efficiency view you can cross-check with FPI, the AP Top 25, and CFP rankings. We do not claim to reproduce ESPN FPI.

What is the difference between SP+, EPA, and PPA?

SP+ is a season-long opponent-adjusted team rating. EPA measures expected points added per play from FantasyHQ play-by-play. PPA (predicted points added) averages game-level efficiency from CollegeFootballData. Switch metrics on the leaderboards page to compare the same season three ways.

Is this the same as AP Top 25 or CFB rankings?

No. AP Top 25, Coaches Poll, and CFP rankings live on FantasyHQ’s CFB Rankings board at https://fantasyhq.co/cfb-hq/rankings. Leaderboards here are analytics power boards (SP+ / EPA / PPA), not voter or committee polls.

Are FantasyHQ CFB analytics leaderboards free?

Yes. SP+, EPA, and PPA team leaderboards, box scores, standings, and schedule tools are free to use in the browser.