2000 Running Back Week 2
41 ranked
2000 · Week 2
NFL running back impact rankings for week 2 of the 2000 season, with impact scores, grades, and player ranks.
Leaders Marshall Faulk · Mike Anderson · Edgerrin James
2000 NFL Running Back Leaders
| # | Player | Team | Impact | Grade | Opp | Touches | Carries | YFS | TD | Rush EPA | Rec EPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
|
|
87.0
|
— | SEA | 26 | 15 | 153 | 1 | 2.71 | 5.19 |
| 2 |
|
|
86.5
|
— | ATL | 34 | 32 | 149 | 2 | 0.29 | 3.66 |
| 3 |
|
|
84.2
|
— | LV | 25 | 18 | 127 | 2 | 2.94 | 1.02 |
| 4 |
|
|
82.2
|
— | PHI | 15 | 11 | 125 | 1 | 5.57 | 1.68 |
| 5 |
|
|
80.7
|
— | LA | 22 | 16 | 103 | 2 | 1.91 | -0.55 |
| 6 |
|
|
78.6
|
— | NE | 11 | 2 | 98 | 0 | 1.51 | 4.53 |
| 7 |
|
|
78.6
|
— | IND | 22 | 20 | 75 | 2 | -2.29 | 2.11 |
| 8 |
|
|
78.3
|
— | NYJ | 26 | 21 | 105 | 0 | -0.92 | 2.08 |
| 9 |
|
|
78.1
|
— | SF | 24 | 22 | 91 | 1 | -0.1 | 0.44 |
| 10 |
|
|
77.8
|
— | LAC | 29 | 24 | 77 | 1 | -2.87 | 1.22 |
| 11 |
|
|
77.5
|
— | CHI | 17 | 15 | 75 | 1 | 3.29 | -0.82 |
| 12 |
|
|
76.4
|
— | CLE | 15 | 12 | 87 | 0 | -1.34 | 4.26 |
| 13 |
|
|
75.7
|
— | DET | 21 | 17 | 87 | 0 | -1.15 | 1.22 |
| 14 |
|
|
75.0
|
— | — | 8 | 0 | 53 | 1 | 0 | 1.79 |
| 15 |
|
|
74.5
|
— | CIN | 9 | 8 | 56 | 1 | 2.21 | -0.45 |
| 16 |
|
|
73.7
|
— | CAR | 17 | 11 | 95 | 0 | 1.08 | -2.85 |
| 17 |
|
|
73.6
|
— | NO | 16 | 15 | 59 | 1 | -1.34 | -0.54 |
| 18 |
|
|
73.5
|
— | NYG | 16 | 7 | 69 | 0 | -3.19 | 1.82 |
| 19 |
|
|
73.4
|
— | IND | 8 | 8 | 66 | 0 | 2.58 | 0 |
| 20 |
|
|
73.2
|
— | MIA | 19 | 18 | 83 | 0 | -2.64 | 0.57 |
| 21 |
|
|
73.1
|
— | BUF | 15 | 11 | 64 | 0 | -1.37 | 0.7 |
| 22 |
|
|
73.0
|
— | KC | 25 | 21 | 97 | 0 | -4.18 | -1.02 |
| 23 |
|
|
72.9
|
— | JAX | 18 | 10 | 72 | 0 | -0.03 | -2.6 |
| 24 |
|
|
72.8
|
— | WAS | 21 | 21 | 65 | 0 | -2.46 | 0 |
| 25 |
|
|
72.6
|
— | CAR | 12 | 4 | 58 | 1 | 0.21 | -2.92 |
| 26 |
|
|
72.6
|
— | DAL | 11 | 9 | 40 | 1 | -0.57 | -0.47 |
| 27 |
|
|
72.5
|
— | CHI | 17 | 14 | 58 | 0 | -0.55 | -1.08 |
| 28 |
|
|
70.7
|
— | PHI | 21 | 21 | 50 | 0 | -4.85 | 0 |
| 29 |
|
|
70.6
|
— | DEN | 8 | 7 | 38 | 0 | 0.34 | -0.6 |
| 30 |
|
|
70.2
|
— | DAL | 27 | 24 | 100 | 0 | -8.68 | 1.59 |
| 31 |
|
|
70.0
|
— | MIN | 12 | 11 | 39 | 0 | -2.97 | 0.43 |
| 32 |
|
|
69.6
|
— | TB | 11 | 6 | 61 | 0 | 2.27 | -6.11 |
| 33 |
|
|
69.5
|
— | TB | 11 | 11 | 20 | 0 | -2.06 | 0 |
| 34 |
|
|
68.7
|
— | CIN | 22 | 20 | 64 | 0 | -8.65 | -0.07 |
| 35 |
|
|
67.7
|
— | TEN | 15 | 14 | 30 | 0 | -5.89 | -0.49 |
| 36 |
|
|
67.0
|
— | GB | 12 | 12 | 17 | 0 | -5.75 | 0 |
| 37 |
|
|
66.7
|
— | GB | 13 | 12 | 31 | 0 | -3.32 | -3.56 |
| 38 |
|
|
66.4
|
— | ARI | 17 | 16 | 58 | 0 | -6.35 | -0.69 |
| 39 |
|
|
65.8
|
— | NE | 15 | 12 | 47 | 0 | -3.18 | -6.38 |
| 40 |
|
|
65.4
|
— | BAL | 11 | 11 | 36 | 0 | -5.4 | 0 |
| 41 |
|
|
64.5
|
— | BAL | 11 | 8 | 20 | 0 | -7.11 | 0.53 |