FantasyHQ · CFB Game Recap

CFB · Week 9 · 10 min read

SMU Mustangs vs. Wake Forest Demon Deacons: 2025 Week 9 Recap

Deacons defeat Mustangs 13–12 in Week 9

#82 R.Maryland caught at 45 paced the box score as Deacons closed out a 12–13 Week 9 finish.

SMU Mustangs 12 6-3
Final 12–13
Wake Forest Demon Deacons 13 6-2 Winner
Winner
Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Final score
12–13
Halftime
SMU Mustangs 6–9 Wake Forest Demon Deacons
Top passer
No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie
FantasyHQ MVP
#82 R.Maryland caught at 45

Top CFB performers · Mustangs

  • No Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.Jennings -1.0 yds · -4.39 EPA/play -4.4 EPA
  • #2 J.Hudson caught at Wake F40 1 rec · 18.0 yds -0.6 EPA
  • #82 R.Maryland caught at 45 1 rec · 49.0 yds +4.2 EPA

Top CFB performers · Deacons

  • No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie 140.0 yds · +0.13 EPA/play +2.4 EPA
  • #10 C.Barnes caught at 17 1 rec · 32.0 yds +1.5 EPA
  • #12 K.Johnson caught at 33 1 rec · 25.0 yds +0.8 EPA

Quick answer

Wake Forest Demon Deacons defeated SMU Mustangs 13–12 in Week 9, 2025. Final score: SMU Mustangs 12, Wake Forest Demon Deacons 13.

Game summary

Wake Forest Demon Deacons edged SMU Mustangs 13–12 in Week 9 of the 2025 season.

  • Scoring: 2 touchdowns, 4 field goals across 6 plays.
  • Passing leader: No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie (Wake Forest) — 140.0 pass yds, +0.13 EPA/play.
  • Receiving leader: #2 J.Hudson caught at Wake F40 — 1 rec, 18.0 yds.
  • EPA edge: Wake Forest (-0.318/play) vs SMU (-0.443/play).

Line score

Final score and points by quarter.

TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
SMU Mustangs066012
Wake Forest Demon Deacons360313

Scoring Map

Each pin marks a score on the field — TDs in the end zone, field goals near the kick line.

SMUSMU Mustangs
WAKEWake Forest Demon Deacons

FantasyHQ CFB Analytics

Scoring timeline

6 scores

Chronological scoring plays — scroll to follow the game.

  1. Wake Forest
    Q1FG

    Points+3

    Yard line
    OPP 8
    Score
    0-3

    Field goal good from 25 yards

  2. SMU
    Q2FG

    Points+3

    Yard line
    OPP 19
    Score
    3-3

    Field goal good from 36 yards

  3. Wake Forest
    Q2TD
    #E#84 E.Falayi caught at 06

    Points+6

    Yard line
    OPP EZ
    Score
    3-9

    #84 E.Falayi caught at 06 catch for a touchdown (12 yards)

  4. SMU
    Q2FG

    Points+3

    Yard line
    OPP 18
    Score
    6-9

    Field goal good from 35 yards

  5. SMU
    Q3TD

    Points+6

    Yard line
    OPP EZ
    Score
    12-9

    Rushing touchdown

  6. Wake Forest
    Q4FG

    Points+3

    Yard line
    OPP 33
    Score
    12-12

    Field goal good from 50 yards

Stars of the game

Top passers, rushers, and receivers from cfbfastR play-by-play.

Passing

  • No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie (Wake Forest) — 140.0 yds · +0.13 EPA/play +2.43 EPA
  • No Huddle-Shotgun #2 R.Ashford (Wake Forest) — 0.0 yds · -1.00 EPA/play -3.99 EPA
  • No Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.Jennings (SMU) — -1.0 yds · -4.39 EPA/play -4.39 EPA

Receiving

  • #2 J.Hudson caught at Wake F40 (SMU) — 1 rec · 18.0 yds -0.56 EPA
  • #82 R.Maryland caught at 45 (SMU) — 1 rec · 49.0 yds +4.16 EPA
  • #10 C.Barnes caught at 17 (Wake Forest) — 1 rec · 32.0 yds +1.50 EPA

Quarterback report card

Attempts, efficiency, and EPA.

PlayerTeamAttCmp%YdsTDEPA/playTotal EPA
No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.PurdieWake Forest1952.6%1400+0.13+2.43
No Huddle-Shotgun #2 R.AshfordWake Forest425.0%00-1.00-3.99
No Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.JenningsSMU10.0%-10-4.39-4.39
Shotgun #2 R.AshfordWake Forest633.3%100-0.96-5.73
Shotgun #7 K.JenningsSMU1136.4%280-0.78-8.60
o Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.JenningsSMU2857.1%1430-0.34-9.65

Team EPA comparison

StatSMUWake Forest
Plays6772
EPA / play-0.443-0.318
Total EPA-29.67-22.87
Success rate19.4%30.6%
Pass EPA / play-0.566-0.400
Rush EPA / play-0.261-0.209
Yards246343

Drive chart

Key possessions and results.

QtrOffensePlaysYardsEPAResult
Q1SMU42-3.43Punt
Q1Wake Forest2-2-2.75Punt
Q1SMU48-4.34Ended
Q1Wake Forest3-12-4.54Punt
Q1SMU3-2-2.96Punt
Q1Wake Forest612-1.82Field goal
Q1SMU32-2.99Punt
Q1Wake Forest33-3.11Punt
Q1SMU1147-0.49Field goal
Q2Wake Forest31-2.94Punt
Q2SMU2-1-5.17Fumble
Q2Wake Forest214+2.25Pass TD
Q2SMU39-1.12Punt
Q2Wake Forest37-2.71Punt
Q2SMU769+1.33Field goal
Q2Wake Forest527-1.42Punt

Biggest EPA swings

  1. Q4 · Wake Forest Demon Deacons · Fumble (-9.98 EPA)
  2. Q3 · Wake Forest Demon Deacons · Shotgun #5 D.Purdie pass intercepted (-6.48 EPA)
  3. Q4 · Wake Forest Demon Deacons · Fumble (-4.93 EPA)
  4. Q2 · SMU Mustangs · Fumble (-4.39 EPA)
  5. Q2 · SMU Mustangs · o Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.Jennings pass to #82 R.Maryland caught at 45 for 49 yards (3rd & 9) (+4.16 EPA)
  6. Q1 · SMU Mustangs · o Huddle-Shotgun #7 K.Jennings pass to #8 Y.Knight caught at 41 for 21 yards (3rd & 9) (+3.52 EPA)
  7. Q1 · Wake Forest Demon Deacons · Punt for 4 yards (-3.4 EPA)
  8. Q3 · Wake Forest Demon Deacons · No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie pass to #10 C.Barnes caught at Wake F27 for 15 yards (3rd & 9) (+3.34 EPA)

Key takeaways

  • Wake Forest Demon Deacons controlled the final (13–12) in Week 9.
  • Passing edge: No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie (Wake Forest) — 140.0 yds.
  • EPA edge: Wake Forest at -0.318 EPA/play.
  • Full EPA, scoring map, and play-by-play live in CFB Analytics Box & Scores.

Frequently asked questions

What was the final score of SMU Mustangs vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons?

SMU Mustangs 12, Wake Forest Demon Deacons 13 in Week 9 of the 2025 college football season.

Who won SMU Mustangs vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons?

Wake Forest Demon Deacons won with a final score of 12–13.

Where can I find the SMU Mustangs vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons box score?

See EPA, scoring timeline, and full play-by-play on FantasyHQ CFB Analytics: /cfb-analytics?game=401752942.

Who led SMU Mustangs vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons in passing?

No Huddle-Shotgun #5 D.Purdie (Wake Forest) led passers with 140.0 yards.

Full analytics box score

Explore every snap, drive chart, and the interactive scoring map for SMU Mustangs at Wake Forest Demon Deacons in FantasyHQ CFB Analytics Box & Scores.

Season records after this game

SMU Mustangs

Entered 6-2 Now 6-3 L

Wake Forest Demon Deacons

Entered 5-2 Now 6-2 W